Dynamic Legislative Bargaining with Veto Power∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Many assemblies grant one or more of their members the right to block decisions even when a proposal has secured the necessary majority—a veto right. In this paper, I analyze the consequences of veto power in an infinitely repeated divide-the-dollar bargaining game with an endogenous status quo policy. The division of the dollar among legislators is unchanged until the committee agrees on a new allocation, which becomes the new status quo. In each period, a committee member is randomly recognized to propose a new division of the dollar. If a majority that includes the veto player prefers this proposal, it is implemented; otherwise, the dollar is divided according to the previous period’s allocation. I show that a Markov equilibrium of this dynamic game exists, and that, irrespective of the discount factor of legislators, their recognition probabilities, and the initial division of the dollar, policy eventually gets arbitrarily close to full appropriation of the dollar by the veto player. Finally, I analyze some measures to reduce the excessive power of the veto player: reducing his or her recognition probability, expanding the committee by increasing the number of veto players, and changing the identity of the veto player in each bargaining round. JEL Classifications: C72, C73, C78, D71, D72, D78
منابع مشابه
Rhetoric in Legislative Bargaining with Asymmetric Information
We analyze a three-player legislative bargaining game over an ideological and a distributive decision. Legislators are privately informed about their ideological intensities, i.e., the weight placed on the ideological decision relative to the weight placed on the distributive decision. Communication takes place before a proposal is offered and majority rule voting determines the outcome. We sho...
متن کاملPresidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics
Most previous studies of the president’s role in the legislative process and the implications of veto power can be placed into two categories. The first is the application of the spatial model of agenda control. These models, which assume that the legislature has a monopoly over the legislative agenda, have typically predicted a limited role for the president in the process. The second research...
متن کاملPolicy Dynamics and Legislative Bargaining
This paper presents a dynamic model of legislative bargaining with an evolving default policy. We show that even with a fixed proposer proposal power is limited in equilibrium. Moreover, legislators have induced preferences over the distribution of benefits. We then apply the model to entitlement policies and models of public good production. Our results provide an explanation for the "ratchet ...
متن کاملEffects of Group Size and Communication Availability ' On Coalition Bargaining in a Veto Game
This study examined the effects of manipulating the size of groups of male student negotiators and their ability to communicate with one another in a game in which one player held veto power (i.e., had to be included in any winning coalition). The predictions of three models, the core, the value, and the weighted probability model, were tested. The game, in which the veto player could form a wi...
متن کاملWas There a Baby in the Bathwater? a Comment on the Supreme Court's Legislative Veto Decision*
Examining the Supreme Court's recent decisions in the legislative veto case, Professor Strauss stresses the importance of a distinction no Justice observed between use of the veto in matters affecting direct, continuing, political, executive-congressional relations, and use of the veto in a regulatory context. Only the latter, he argues, had to be reached by the Court; and only the latter prese...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011